🔨 Article Fluoride & Fear

 


Subtitle: RFK Jr.’s Crusade Against Chemicals Ends in a Surveillance State

Act I: The Freedom Fighter Who Traded in Fear

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. rose to national prominence by branding himself as a crusader for freedom and bodily autonomy. He decried fluoride in the water, vaccines in arms, and toxins in our daily lives. He positioned himself as the anti-establishment alternative to both parties—someone who claimed to protect the individual from state and corporate overreach.

But freedom, it seems, has a shelf life.

Because RFK Jr. is now backing a plan that would turn millions of autistic Americans into data points—tagged, tracked, and quantified in a centralized government database using insurance records, Medicaid/Medicare claims, medical charts, and smartwatch surveillance.

This is not freedom. This is digital eugenics wearing a mask of public health.

Act II: From Fluoride to Fingerprints

The shift is not subtle—it’s jarring.

Kennedy has long claimed that fluoride, vaccines, and environmental chemicals were responsible for a supposed explosion in autism. He leaned heavily on debunked studies, rat trials with unrealistic dosing, and anecdotal horror stories, all while ignoring the broader scientific consensus.

And now, after decades of fearmongering, he proposes a solution: track autistic people.

  • Not support them.

  • Not increase funding for neurodivergent education or housing.

  • Not offer legal protections against discrimination.

Just track them—through state-sponsored spyware.

This is the equivalent of screaming about poisoned tap water for years and then installing a smart faucet that sends your drinking habits to DHS.

Act III: Medicaid as a Trap

What’s most sinister is who this database targets.

It’s not the wealthy.
It’s not the tech elite with private health insurance.

It’s:

  • Poor and working-class Americans on Medicaid.

  • Elderly and disabled people on Medicare.

  • Children and adults who may not have the means to resist or opt out.

This isn’t voluntary medical research—it’s coercion by dependency. It’s a quiet but devastating violation of HIPAA and consent ethics, using vulnerability as the gateway to total surveillance.

RFK Jr. leveraged public distrust of government health agencies to build his brand. Now he wants to partner with those very agencies to monitor autistic bodies in real-time.

Act IV: Data Harvesting in a Lab Coat

Let’s be honest—this isn’t just about health outcomes.

Smartwatch data?
Claims logs?
Cloud-based behavioral mapping?

That’s not research. That’s bio-capitalism.

This is a dataset goldmine for:

  • Private insurance firms wanting to hike premiums.

  • Pharmaceutical giants looking to tailor drugs for profit.

  • AI surveillance firms fine-tuning their predictive policing models.

You think your smartwatch is counting your steps?
In this system, it’s counting your compliance.

Act V: When Libertarian Rhetoric Becomes Authoritarian Reality

RFK Jr. built his image on rejecting “The Man.” But when power knocked on his door, he answered with open arms.

This plan isn’t just a betrayal of neurodivergent people—it’s a betrayal of his entire platform.

He is no longer the outsider.
He’s now the enabler of a techno-medical dragnet, using the same tools he once condemned.

His legacy may very well become this:

The man who cried freedom while building the infrastructure for state control.

Final Words: This Is Not About Help. It’s About Control.

We must reject this false binary of “track them to help them.”
Data doesn’t heal people—care does.
Surveillance doesn’t protect rights—it erodes them.

Autistic people deserve:

  • Autonomy.

  • Representation.

  • Care rooted in dignity—not datafication.

Because a freedom built on fear isn’t freedom.
It’s a cage with a biometric lock.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Death by Policy: How American Institutions Are Quietly Thinning the Herd

Image
Death by Policy: How American Institutions Are Quietly Thinning the Herd Introduction What if the greatest threat to your life wasn’t a natural disaster or a foreign enemy—but a bureaucratic decision buried in an NIH memo or a Medicaid proposal? From scientific research to healthcare access, a coordinated erosion of public good is underway. It’s slow, procedural, and written in the language of oversight and efficiency. But the outcome is unmistakable: fewer people survive. This isn’t dysfunction. It’s design. And the people who survive it? That’s no accident either. 1. NIH Subawards: Cutting the Lifeline of Global Science In May 2025, the National Institutes of Health announced that foreign institutions would no longer be eligible for subawards through U.S.-based research grants. For the layperson, this sounds like a small administrative tweak. In reality, it’s an act of scientific isolationism that endangers lives. Subawards are how research projects work across borders. A U.S....
Read more

Title: When a President Defies the Court — and Laughs About It

Image
The Trump White House didn’t just violate a federal court order — they bragged about it. On April 17, the official @WhiteHouse account mocked a New York Times headline about a man wrongly deported under Trump’s immigration policies. The man — Kilmar Abrego Garcia — had a valid asylum claim, but the administration deported him anyway, in defiance of judicial rulings. Then came the tweet. “Fixed it for you, @NYTimes,” the account posted, crossing out “wrongly deported” and replacing it with “MS-13 ILLEGAL ALIEN.” Then, the kicker: “@ChrisVanHollen — he’s NOT coming back.” This isn’t just cruel. It’s authoritarian. The Trump administration is openly thumbing its nose at the rule of law. They're ignoring judicial orders, violating constitutional norms, and doing so with public glee . They aren't hiding their contempt — they’re turning it into content. When the White House uses its platform not to explain policy but to mock a federal judge’s ruling, that’s not spin — that’s...
Read more